import/named Correctness
What it does
Verifies that all named imports are part of the set of named exports in the referenced module.
For export, verifies that all named exports exist in the referenced module.
Note: for packages, the plugin will find exported names from jsnext:main (deprecated) or module, if present in package.json. Redux's npm module includes this key, and thereby is lintable, for example.
A module path that is ignored or not unambiguously an ES module will not be reported when imported. Note that type imports and exports, as used by Flow, are always ignored.
Why is this bad?
Importing or exporting names that do not exist in the referenced module can lead to runtime errors and confusion. It may suggest that certain functionality is available when it is not, making the code harder to maintain and understand. This rule helps ensure that your code accurately reflects the available exports, improving reliability.
Examples
Given
// ./foo.js
export const foo = "I'm so foo";Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
// ./baz.js
import { notFoo } from "./foo";
// ES7 proposal
export { notFoo as defNotBar } from "./foo";
// will follow 'jsnext:main', if available
import { dontCreateStore } from "redux";Examples of correct code for this rule:
// ./bar.js
import { foo } from "./foo";
// ES7 proposal
export { foo as bar } from "./foo";
// node_modules without jsnext:main are not analyzed by default
// (import/ignore setting)
import { SomeNonsenseThatDoesntExist } from "react";